According to James Randerson, reporting in The Guardian:
The MPs polled by the Guardian were also in favour of three controversial aspects of the new bill, which has exposed deep divisions on ethical questions about genetic testing, parenthood and the sanctity of human embryos.He goes on to say:
In March, Gordon Brown was forced to allow his party a free vote on these under pressure from three catholic cabinet ministers Paul Murphy, Ruth Kelly and Des Browne, who reportedly planned to vote against the government.
Many MPs are appalled by the way senior Catholic figures have tried to influence the debate. Martin Salter, Labour MP for Reading West, felt the comments of Cardinal Keith O'Brien in his Easter sermon which likened the hybrid embryo proposals to "research of Frankenstein proportions" were offensive. "Imagine the way we would feel if a Muslim cleric tried to dictate how we vote," Salter said.Which serves to further underline the point regularly found in surveys - that the average person wants religious authorities to stop interfering in politics. It looks like this attempt has backfired on the Catholic Church - perhaps they'll learn from it.
For the BHA perspective, take a look at The Embryology Bill: The BHA's Andrew Copson on BBC News 24.
In one of several clear votes against the religious lobby MPs voted against a ban on hybrid embryos (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/1988846/MPs-vote-against-human-animal-hybrid-embryo-ban.html).
ReplyDeleteThe proposal to impose a ban was defeated by 336 to 176. Though the result isn't final until the bill passes all its stages, including the Lords, it's very unlikely that the Lords will challenge the Commons on any of these matters.