Field of Science

Religion and volunteering

The last post was on religion and work ethic. So to follow up here's another new paper on a similar topic: religion and volunteering.

Religious people do more voluntary work than non-religious people. According to a June 2009 Canadian report, the 15% people who go to Church every week make up 26% of the volunteer workforce.

It's difficult to figure out exactly why this should be. Is it spiritual beliefs? The evidence I put up in my previous post, linking religious beliefs to a small increase in work ethic, might make lead you to think so. Religious people get an extra reward from volunteering (they usually believe they'll get some kind of bonus from their God): that makes it more attractive.

But maybe it's cultural. Religious people tend to swim in a sea of 'volunteerism', so volunteering might simply be something that's expected of them by their peers. They also get more opportunities to volunteer, by virtue of being plugged into a ready-made volunteer network.

In contrast, non-religious people might be excluded from volunteering because (especially in a religious society), many opportunities for volunteering come with a lot of religious baggage. That can be a turn-off for the non-religious.

The new study, by Bianca Suanet and colleagues at VU University in the Netherlands, is interesting because it takes a fresh angle on the problem (VU University, by the way, has its historical roots as a Christian university).

They looked at two samples of Dutch people, a set who were around 60 years old in 1992, and a set of people who turned 60 in around 2002. In other words, the second set of people was born 10 years later.

They found that 43% of people who were 60 in 1992 did voluntary work, but this had dropped to 37% of those who were 60 in 2002. A small drop, but statistically significant.

Next they looked at the factors that might explain the drop. Most had no effect: it didn't matter whether they were employed, had a father who was a church member, had a mother who did volunteer work, or had well educated parents.

What did matter is their own level of education - highly educated people were 2.7 times more likely to volunteer than people with low education levels. That might be, of course, because highly educated people tend to also have high levels of self-motivation. But presumably the psychological characteristics of the cohorts were the same, which suggests that it's a direct effect of education on volunteerism.

And the other factor that made a difference was religious involvement. People who had religious beliefs but didn't go to Church were not more likely to volunteer. But people who did go to Church were.

For religious non-Christians and Catholics, the effect was impressive - they were over 2.5 times more likely to volunteer than the non-religious. But for practising Calvinists, the effect was dramatic - they were 4.7 times more likely to volunteer.

Now, the actual effects of religion remain pretty small. Overall, they could explain only 16% of the variation among individuals. And religion is only a fraction of that (it's pretty hard to tell from the stats they present, but it probably explains about 5-10% of the variability). It's small, but it's there.

So in light of this, there's one other fascinating fact that comes out from the study. It turns out that, after controlling for all the other factors (including the increase in their education levels and the loss of religious belief), the more recent set of 'oldies' were actually more likely to be volunteers.

In other words, the decline in religion causes a negative hit on volunteering. That's made up for a bit by the increase in education. But there's something else going on that's increasing volunteering.

And that something may well be cultural. To me, it seems likely that Dutch society is reinventing itself as religion becomes increasingly marginalised. Whereas religion and volunteering were once intimately connected, now volunteering is something for non-believers as well (incidentally, this is reflected in the constitution of VU University itself, which transformed itself in the 1960s from a religious university to a secular, state funded one).

So a secular future may not mean a future without volunteers. And the good news from Canada is that this is probably the case.

Canada, like other Western nations, has seen plummeting religious participation (Statistics Canada). And volunteering went down from 191 hours per person in 1987 to 149 hours in 1997 (here's the 1997 report). But the last report shows an uptick, with volunteer rates climbing to 166 hours in 2007.

I think that the take-home from this is that religion probably does stimulate volunteering. But religion is not the only way to achieve this, and it's probably not the best, either.

_______________________________________________________________________________________

ResearchBlogging.org
Suanet, B., Broese van Groenou, M., & Braam, A. (2009). Changes in volunteering among young old in the Netherlands between 1992 and 2002: the impact of religion, age-norms, and intergenerational transmission European Journal of Ageing, 6 (3), 157-165 DOI: 10.1007/s10433-009-0119-7

Creative Commons LicenseThis work by Tom Rees is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.

17 comments:

  1. What were the samples sizes of the two Dutch cohorts? Must have been rather large for the 6% difference to be significant...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hmm...it sounds like the main conclusion for this should not be "religious people volunteer more" but "people who go to church regularly volunteer more".

    Both of these two quotes: "15% people who go to Church every week make up 26% of the volunteer workforce." and "People who had religious beliefs but didn't go to Church were not more likely to volunteer. But people who did go to Church were."

    In that case it seems that it's just confirming that people who make commitments are more likely to make more than one. there may be several christian people who simply "aren't bothered" to go to church regularly, and therefore it's not surprising that they similarly aren't bothered to do volunteering. This seems to be more of a thing about regular commitment (for little or no material reward) rather than some kind of moral spirituality from the religion itself.

    Also, it's possible that people in Church get exposed to a wider variety of information about volunteering services. Wehn i go into churchs, they always seem to be full of leaflets for various christian volunteering groups and how to get involved, whereas there is no similar secular place to get all that information.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nice write up and good find.

    Two things come to mind on this. First, most of the studies I've seen on the religion/volunteering connection are from the U.S. So, Holland may simply be different to begin with.

    Second, the one factor I don't think anyone has ever talked about when it comes to studies like these is that what is meant by "volunteering" is very likely different for those who attend services frequently and those who don't. For instance, the frequent attenders can count "ushering at church" or "singing in the church choir" as volunteering. They can also count evangelism as volunteering as well. If someone were to capture the different forms of volunteering, my guess is that they would really begin to wash out if you excluded volunteering that is really more just contributing to the religious service. Thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  4. BjĆørn: There were about 1,000 people in each data set, and the difference in volunteering was significant at the 0.01 level.

    Lab rat: The interesting thing about this study is that the two groups presumably have a similar genetic makeup, so if something changes from one group to the next it's probably an environmental effect.

    In other words, the people predisposed to commitment are still there in the younger group, it's just that their environment (less religion) means that they volunteer less.

    I think (based on other research I've seen) that the strongest link is between religious participation and volunteering. And I think that what's happening is that placing people in an environment where volunteering is a social norm makes them more likely to volunteer themselves.

    RTC: I think Holland is different, and I've also seen some interesting studies from Norway and Finland. They give quite a different picture from the 'mainstream' picture given in the US. Probably worth a post in its own right.

    You're right that a lot of volunteering by religious people is to do specific religious activities (i.e. not 'charity' as most people would understand it). But the 1997 Canadian study found that the religiously active were also more likely to do 'non-religious' volunteering.

    From a psychological perspective, both are equally puzzling. You're spending 'time', which could be spent doing something else, doing something that seems useless to you. Clearly people do it because they do actually get something out of it - but the logic probably applies equally to religious and non-religious voluntary work.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think the argument about the non-religious failing to volunteer as much as the religious because many volunteer opportunities are religious is a bit circular. If the non-religious were willing to volunteer at equal rates, then there would be more activities for the non religious people to volunteer in. If volunteering as a value was important to the non-religious, they would seek out opportunities to do so.

    Instead I think its driven by the precepts of the various religions that encourage volunteering as a function of faith (Mitzvahs for Jews, Corporal Acts of Mercy for Catholics, etc). Not all believers are equally motivated to act on the precepts of there faith, but some do and that changes the distributions between the two populations.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "If the non-religious were willing to volunteer at equal rates, then there would be more activities for the non religious people to volunteer in."

    But that's the problem: in most countries the religious outnumber the non-religious by a very large majority. Even more so if you consider that most volunteer institutions have historical roots (when religion was even more prevalent).

    So that's why the results from this study are interesting. There's something that has changed in the youngest cohort that has encouraged volunteering, in the face of declining religiosity. A cultural shift, perhaps, that facilitates non-religious volunteering?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I was not talking about a genetic predisposition at all, but an environmental one. There will be many different factors in upbringing and social environment between two different generations, religion is most definately not the only mitigating factor in this study. Indeed given the things that seem to be stereotyped on this generation (general apathy for 'causes', both religious and political) it is probably more true that the decrease in regular church visits and regular volunteering are both symptoms of a similar cause, namely that most people in this generation just can't be bothered, or would rather spend the time securing their own happiness, in a world which seems less likely to deliver on happiness itself.

    (just for the record, I personally don't think that genetics has much to do with any of this. In fact, although I know this was not your intention, I feel a little misrepresended here, as I spent a reasonable amount of my student time formulating arguements *against* the exclusively 'genetic' outlook. Even in bacteria, there is a lot more to phenotype than genotype, and with humans even more so)

    I like RTC's point a lot as well, its subseqent shooting-down notwithstanding :) Many of my relatives are involved in religious groups, and so a lot of volunteer work exclusively for those groups.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Lab rat sorry for the misunderstanding! I agree that religious attendance is one facet of more generalised commitment. If social engagement drops between generations, then you'd expect both religious attendance and volunteering to also drop.

    But the nagging thing in this study is the cohort effect. After controlling for religious attendance and education, the younger cohort are *more* likely to volunteer.

    That suggests to me something is happening in wider society that's acting to increase civic engagement in the face of the loss of the historical focus of engagement (religion).

    ReplyDelete
  9. AH HA!
    A medical writer who's into god stuff, ehh?
    My video, irregardless of the title/format, is most serious and may be of interst to you.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_m6qC6FCiY0

    Stay on groovin' safari,
    Tor

    ReplyDelete
  10. What I'd love to know is whether religious folks' volunteering is a function of degree of belief in whether God is watching them in the act of volunteering.

    Also: sometimes volunteering involves going to a specific location, and attending church may make it easier to go as a group.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think you hit the nail on the head when stating that religious people have more opportunities to volunteer. When I was religious, you couldn't go in the building without discovering easy ways to volunteer. Now that I'm not religious, I have spent hours trying to find some place I can volunteer without massive repeat time commitments (like Big Brother Big Sister have). I think what needs to change is the community providing the same service of finding and advertising volunteering opportunities. Maybe community centers and libraries could become the hub of information on volunteering opportunities?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anon, it's a good question, and it's one I'm digging into at the moment. A topic for a blog post, if I find something interesting!

    There was a fasscinating study (not about types of beliefs, but still about motivations) reviewed by Norenzayan & Sharrif in their 1998 paper in Science. Here'show they described it:

    In one experiment, for example, participants were given the option of volunteering to raise money for a sick child who could not pay his medical bills (24). Participants in one condition were led to believe that they would certainly be called upon if they volunteered. In another, participants could volunteer although told that they were unlikely to be called upon. In
    the latter condition, participants could reap the social benefits of feeling (or appearing) helpful
    without the cost of the actual altruistic act. Only in the latter situation was a link between
    religiosity and volunteering evident. Many studies have corroborated that religiosity predicts prosocial behavior primarily when the prosocial
    act could promote a positive image for the participant, either in his or her own eyes or in the eyes of observers.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hi Tom,

    Please define the "environmental effect."
    Why the religion had to start the volunteering works? (why humans could not start it because of environmental effect?)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Is "compassion" an environmental effect?
    If so can we name war and crime also as environmental effects?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anon - there's clearly an environmental effect (i.e other sociological factors other than religion). Humans are driven by their psychological makeup to volunteer. Question is what effect does religion have? Japan has a low volunteer rate. Why is that? Clearly cultural (and nothing to do with compassion, since the Japanese social system looks after the people at the bottom of the pile).

    ReplyDelete
  16. It's quite simple; if you belong to a church, they ask and expect you to volunteer. The way one ends up volunteering (I know, I volunteer a lot, I'm retired) is because you join an organization and then they say - great, glad to have you aboard, would you like to do this? What can you say, it's expected if you are part of the organization. And churches do a lot of "good works". Nothing mysterious, just the way volunteers get recruited.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I agree with John Draper - if you belong to a church, you get asked to volunteer a lot more often than if you don't.

    Is there any data on the TYPE of volunteering for religious/non-religious groups? A lot of the stuff religions ask you to volunteer for is to support their/your church (bake something for the bake sale) or just isn't worth doing, (ring doorbells for jesus, etc.) in my opinion.

    I've also heard that relgious people donate more to charity than non-religious, but since your weekly donations are tax deductible, they count as charity even though they mainly benefit the "givers" and their church.

    ReplyDelete

Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS