Field of Science

The hypnotic power of charismatic religion

Whatever else you think about charismatic preachers, they have a dramatic power over their audience. While their followers believe them to have special powers, a new brain imaging study by Uffe SchjĆødt at Aarhus University in Denmark suggests that it's all just a product of their imagination.

In fact, the brain imaging study is only part of the story. What's even more remarkable is what it says about how some people come to fall under the spell of these charismatics.

What they did was to take a small group of pentecostal Christians and a matched group of non-believers. Both were chosen so as to represent the extreme ends of the belief scale.

They were asked to listen to prayers being read by three different people who, they were told, were a non-Christian, an ordinary Christian, and a Christian 'known for his healing powers'. In fact, they were all ordinary Christians...

So there was no real difference between the prayers (the speakers were mixed up to make sure differences in speaking style could not affect the experiment). The only difference was what the listener was told, but what a dramatic effect it had!

When asked, the pentecostalists rated the one they were told was a healer as the most charismatic, and the person they thought was non-religious as much less charismatic (see the graph). For the non-believers, there was a slight trend in the same direction, but it was small and insignificant. Basically, they weren't taken in by the deception.

But the pentecostalists were. Just telling a pentecostalists that someone has healing powers makes them think that they are highly charismatic. What's more, they didn't feel God's presence in the prayers read by the person they were told was a non-Christian.

So where does the hypnotism come in? Well, specific regions of the pentecostalist's brains became somewhat activated when listening to the prayer from the 'non-believer', but highly deactivated when listening to the prayer from the 'charismatic healer'. The prayer from the ordinary Christian resulted in deactivation too, but on a small scale.

And the regions that were deactivated by the 'charismatic healer' were all associated with 'executive function' - the part of the mind that evaluates, monitors, and makes decisions. A similar response has been seen in the brains of people undergoing hypnosis - as well as meditation.

In other words, they went into a bit of a trance.

What SchjĆødt thinks is happening here is that, when we listen someone we trust implicitly, we switch off our critical faculties, and just let what they are saying wash over us. In the words of the researchers, "subjects suspend or 'hand over' their critical faculty to the trusted person."

Now, in this scenario the atheists were immune to the powers of the charismatic preacher. But we shouldn't run away with the idea that this is a particular characteristic of religious people. Stage hypnosis shows that you that you can see similar effects in secular situations - and Milgram's scary experiments in authority also spring to mind.

What strikes me most about this study is that the charisma of the preacher was all in the minds of the subjects. They were willing dupes.

And what this study also shows is just how closely linked the razmatazz of charismatic preachers is to the showmanship of stage hypnotists. They seem to be exploiting a common human weakness - and one that has enormous power!

Hat tip: Paliban Daily and New Scientist.


ResearchBlogging.orgSchjoedt, U., Stodkilde-Jorgensen, H., Geertz, A., Lund, T., & Roepstorff, A. (2010). The power of charisma - perceived charisma inhibits the frontal executive network of believers in intercessory prayer Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsq023

Creative Commons License This article by Tom Rees was first published on Epiphenom. It is licensed under Creative Commons.

7 comments:

  1. That was a fantastic artice, how insightful.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very interesting, indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'd love to see the reverse experiment done with luminaries in the so-called New Atheist movement, i.e. have some little blurb talking about religion and tell people it is either from Richard Dawkins or from Francis Collins or whatever.

    I do notice a particular feeling when I'm reading an opinion statement by someone I have respect for... I feel like I'm still mostly remaining critical, but I wonder if that is the same sort of feeling.. I dunno, just thinking aloud.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Eh, the major issue with that study would be that Dawkins has a voice that's fairly distinct to those that have heard it often(eg: those that would presumably be most powerfully influenced by this effect because they're Dawkins/etc fans.)

    I suppose one could always go a written route, but I'd be interested to see that side of things done just in the above study's design with religious people too. The written word would give people more time to go back and say "Hey, wait a minute... That's just not right!" perhaps reducing this effect, but it's obviously not the case that people critically review everything they read either. I'd assume that a similar effect would happen when reading essays by someone they think is "a Christian known for his healing powers" vs those written by a "non-Christian," but my assumptions aren't data.

    I can't access the proper article right now, will have to get it later, but did they talk about that sort of follow-up Tom? If not, did they suggest anything further at all?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kassul: No, no mention of a follow up along those lines. They do talk about the need to replicate the study in different cultures, though. The written word is a little bit more hard work than th spoken word, so I don't know whether you would get the same effect (i.e. a shutting down of executive function). You might get it with recitation of religious passages.

    ReplyDelete
  6. this phenomenon occurs in the meetings charismatic / Pentecostal but the phenomenon that gave birth to Pentecostalism was the acceptance of the gift of speaking in tongues to modern times and not just something that happened in the time of the apostles.
    A couple of years ago an article came out about the research on this phenomenon, I would like to be able to do some research post dedicated to this subject greetings from chile south america (sorry for my English)

    link here
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/07/health/07brain.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. I am and always have been an atheist but I was at a gathering of missionarys many years ago where they were spoken to by a woman who talked about enthusiasm for religion. She was old, fat and ugly and I disagreed with her about her whole life view but I was totally impressed by how she talked. She was mesmerising and I have never forgotten her exhortations to enthusiasm, I just left the religion out of it and still found her inspirational. I had been expecting to be bored and irritated, but I was captivated instead.

    I don't know how my experience fits with this information, I guess some people do really have charisma.

    ReplyDelete

Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS